bronzeCatherine is a bronze member
Exclusive IR Global Advisor for Environmental Law in California since 2020

Catherine Johnson

+1 925-400-9025

Biography

Education

  • Smith College
  • University of Virginia, School of Law

Biography

  • Catherine specializes in California and federal environmental law, representing a broad range of clients and industries, including manufacturing facilities, national transportation companies, food companies, a recycling facility, and leaders in the commercial real estate and multi-family housing industry. She has represented several of her current clients for decades, including a national Real Estate Investment Trust, developers, and a marine terminal. Catherine’s areas of expertise include brownfields development, soil vapor intrusion, Proposition 65, pollution legal liability insurance policies, hazardous and solid waste, landfills, Superfund sites, electronic waste, underground storage tanks, asbestos-containing materials, lead-based paint, mold, radon, methane gas, OSHA, Porter-Cologne Act, Truck & Bus Regulation, CERCLA, RCRA, Clean Water Act, Clean Air Act, and all aspects of the investigation, cleanup, and closure of contaminated properties. Catherine has special expertise in vapor intrusion and contaminated sites, major development projects (including associated agreements such as CLRRA Agreements and PPAs), and environmental due diligence. Catherine has handled enforcement actions brought by federal, state, and local agencies under a variety of laws, including one of the first U.S. EPA enforcement actions brought under the California Truck & Bus Regulation. Catherine’s transactional and compliance practice at EGC is backed by years of litigation experience, where she served either as lead counsel or co-counsel in several major cases, including citizens’ suits claims (Prop 65, stormwater), CERCLA cost recovery claims, and claims for property damage associated with subsurface contamination and soil vapor intrusion. Catherine was lead attorney for the landmark case, U.S. v. Chapman, 146 F.3d 1166, 1169 (9th Cir. 1998) (the first case to limit EPA’s ability to recover its litigation fees in a CERCLA cost-recovery action)and she was lead co-counsel for SF Baykeeper v. Levin Enterprises, (N.D. CA, 2013) (the first decision to define limits to stormwater permit requirements for the transportation industry). Catherine is Chair of the Executive Committee of the Environmental Section of the Bar Association of San Francisco.
Read more

About Environmental General Counsel PC

Environmental General Counsel PC (EGC) is a California environmental boutique law firm with a Consumer Product Practice, focusing on Proposition (“Prop”) 65 compliance plans, extended producer responsibility (EPR) packaging and foodservice ware programs, and truth-in-labeling requirements, and a Remediation Practice, focusing on remediation of contaminated properties with special expertise in vapor intrusion.

EGC offers strategic and cost-effective compliance advice geared toward your company’s specific objectives and needs. We also handle related matters within our core practice areas, including litigation, litigation support, and, where applicable, assistance with the rulemaking process (e.g., drafting public comments for the EPR packaging regulations).

We represent a diverse range of industries, including food and beverage, high tech, bioscience, apparel, industrial manufacturing, beauty products, paper and printing, health care, transportation, real estate, and others. Our clients range from publicly traded Fortune 50 and S&P 500 companies to privately owned companies and small businesses.

EGC is represented on the Advisory Board of Prop 65 Clearinghouse News, the Advisory Board of the Executive Committee of the Bar Association of San Francisco’s Environmental Section, the National Stewardship Action Council, the IR Global Rising Star Program, and the Product Stewardship Institute.

EGC handled the landmark Prop 65 case, EHA v. Sream, Inc. , 83 Cal. App. 5th 721 (2022), heralded in the national media as a rare win for a Prop 65 defendant. EGC successfully argued that Prop 65 warnings on consumer products for chemicals not contained in the product itself would only result in confusing warnings – and also would impede efforts by industry to plan for Prop 65 compliance.  As a direct result of EHA v. Sream, Inc., companies can prepare for  meaningful compliance, by focusing on Prop 65 chemicals in their own products, rather than assuming legal responsibility for anticipating any foreseeable use of their product in conjunction with another product that might result in an exposure.

EGC is also one of the few law practices in California actively engaged with California’s EPR packaging program since its inception.  EGC has been participating in regulatory workshops, networking with the major players in the field, and has been actively involved in the rulemaking process.  EGC is also the only law practice to offer clients an opportunity to partner with an affiliated consulting firm, EPR Group Consulting Inc, a multidisciplinary practice devoted exclusively to helping clients align their EPR packaging programs across multiple state programs.

Read more

Exclusive IR Global advisor for Environmental Law in California

1990 N. California Blvd Ste 20 Walnut Creek CA 94596

Colleagues